Gold miners caught in a value trap

James Butterfill, Aneeka Gupta -

Gold miners are historically very cheap but at this juncture are likely to be a value trap due to profitability concerns

We find ourselves starting 2016 with heightened market volatility. A global sell off in financial markets has pushed up gold prices by 2%, while gold miners have fallen by 7%. This has piqued our interest in the rationality of the historical parity between gold and its miners. While the case for gold remains intact we scrutinize the current valuation of gold miners. For the purpose of this report, gold miners refer to the constituents of the DAXglobal Gold Miners USD (TR) Index.
At first glance, offering a 59% discount to the gold price since 2009, gold miners seem attractive. Coupled with a price to book value of 1.0x and an average dividend yield of 2.8% make them a compelling investment from a valuation perspective.
But when comparing with the mining sector in general, which trades at a price to book of 0.69 and an average dividend yield of 5.5%, gold miners do not offer the best value in the sector.

etf gold miners caught in a value trap1

Furthermore, the decline in median cash dividend cover to 1.4x suggests sustainability of dividend payments remains questionable.

Elevated production costs dent margins
The recent slide in energy prices, (which has historically been positive for miners), and depreciation of currencies in jurisdictions where the local miners operate, has had minimal beneficial impact on cash costs. Cash costs continue to rise and consequently narrow profit margins. Given the decline in exploration of new projects and construction of new mines we have used “cash costs” as our metric for calculating the mining cost of production as opposed to “all in sustaining costs” which includes the full costs of producing gold including exploration and bringing new mines online.

etf gold miners caught in a value trap2

Declining ore grades raise production costs
A significant factor contributing to the rising cash costs is the decline in average ore grades of existing mines that have witnessed a staggering 51% decline since 2000. Either the gold is too dispersed (low grade) or buried too deep underground (high grade) making the task of gold mining quite expensive given its capital intensive nature. The average ore grades of producing mines stand at 1.18g/ton, while that of undeveloped deposits is 0.89g/ton according to Visual Capitalist. These undeveloped mines represent a staggering 66% of all deposits on earth, leaving gold miners faced with deteriorating efficiency and higher costs as current reserves are depleted.

etf gold miners caught in a value trap3

Discovery drought weighs on profitability
In addition, the future profitability of miners has come into question as they face the brunt of aggressive reductions in capital expenditure in the form of closures of uneconomical mines and curtailed exploration budgets. The golden era that lasted from 2001 to 2011 rewarded gold miners for aggressive growth over cash flow generation, eroding company valuations over the long run as they were funded by record amount of debt.

etf gold miners caught in a value trap4

Today, long term risks to supply remain at the forefront of the debate after capital expenditures have declined to the lowest level in 12 years.

Gold miners are much higher risk
The financial credibility of the gold miners is low. The credit default swap spreads (CDS) for gold mining companies have risen 712% on average since 2003 to 220 basis points, well above the 66bp average for the S&P500. While it is unlikely to prompt a wave of impending defaults, as the net debt to EBITDA is low at 0.5, it reflects the increased risk of owning gold miners particularly when compared to the relative safe haven of physical gold. Furthermore, it highlights gold miners’ ability to raise debt while debt costs are typically rising, is becoming more difficult.

etf gold miners caught in a value trap5

We continue to prefer gold over gold miners
We believe that gold prices will be constrained by rising nominal interest rates and some strengthening of the US Dollar in the short-term. However, we believe the US Federal Reserve (Fed) is potentially behind the curve with risks of inflation
rising by more than their expectations and the markets in the longer-term. Furthermore, we believe the US Dollar strength is likely to wane, taking some of the gold-negative pressure away.
Contrary to popular belief, historically gold tends to rise in the first year of rate hikes, having only faltered when real interest rates rose aggressively in 1994. We believe a repeat of 1994 is unlikely in light of dovish leadership at the Fed.
Despite the low valuation of gold miners, on a risk adjusted basis we prefer physical gold and other areas of the mining sector which offer much better value.

James Butterfill – Head of Research & Investment Strategist – ETF Securities
Aneeka Gupta – Equity & Commodities Strategist – ETF Securities