■ Recent ECB commentary suggests that the Governing Council is very likely to end QE at its June meeting and guide towards lift-off at the July meeting, consistent with our forecast for a 25bp hike in July. The subsequent pace of hikes, however, remains subject to debate given slowing growth and stubbornly high inﬂation.
■ The Euro area activity dataﬂow since the start of the war has been mixed, with robust services growth but very weak industrial activity. The outlook for the rest of the year remains soft given the incoming consumer drag from high energy prices, weaker trade and tighter ﬁnancial conditions. We lower our area-wide forecast slightly further, pushing down our 2022 growth forecast by 0.1pp to 2.5% (vs 2.7% consensus) and reducing our 2023 projection by 0.2pp to 1.7% (vs 2.3% consensus). The key risk remains a large-scale disruption of Russian gas supply, which would push the Euro area into recession, with large contractions in Germany and Italy.
■ At the same time, the incoming information implies yet more persistent inﬂationary pressures. First, our analysis points to more signiﬁcant second-round effects from the surge in energy prices and we raise our wage growth projections to 2.8% this year and 3.6% in 2023. Second, we estimate that the weakness of the Euro will push up inﬂation moderately over the next couple of years. Third, the re-intensiﬁcation of bottlenecks is likely to keep core inﬂation elevated for longer. Taken together, we raise our inﬂation forecasts and now expect area-wide core HICP inﬂation to remain at 2.2% at the end of 2023 (up from 1.8% before) and at 2.1% in 2024Q4.
■ Our revised inﬂation path points to greater pressure on the Governing Council to tighten monetary policy rapidly despite weak growth. We therefore accelerate our ECB tightening forecast and now expect the Governing Council to hike 25bp at back-to-back meetings until June next year to a terminal rate of 1.5%. Compared to our previous forecast we now (1) accelerate the move towards neutral (from December to April 2023) and (2) add one extra hike that takes the monetary policy stance slightly into restrictive territory.
■ Given the high uncertainty around the outlook, we consider a range of scenarios and map these into deposit rate paths using an estimated ECB reaction function. First, we ﬁnd that the Governing Council would likely hike more quickly and move further into contractionary territory if second-round effects turn out to be stronger. Second, our analysis suggests that the emergence of sovereign stress—if unchecked through a backstop—could pause the hiking cycle. Third, a Russian gas ban, even when combined with a large negative conﬁdence shock, would not necessarily delay lift-off, but would likely slow the hiking cycle and could require policy easing next year.
Given high inﬂation, a weak Euro and rising concern about second-round inﬂation effects, the Governing Council is likely to end QE at its June meeting, signal that its inﬂation conditions for lift-off have been met and guide towards the ﬁrst hike at the July meeting. ECB ofﬁcials, however, face a difﬁcult trade-off in setting the pace of policy rate increases. On the one hand, uncertainties around the war in Ukraine, the expected slowdown of consumption and the risk of sovereign stress as rates rise point to a gradual normalisation pace. On the other hand, stubbornly high headline inﬂation, the likelihood of second-round inﬂation effects and the very accommodative level of real rates calls for more urgency in the speed of tightening.
A Cautious Outlook for Activity
The Euro area activity dataﬂow since the start of the war has been mixed. Services activity held up better than expected in March and April—given a robust post-Omicron rebound—and we look for strong tourism activity in the summer months, especially in the South (Exhibit 1, left). But manufacturing activity has slowed sharply, especially in Germany, reﬂecting weak auto production in March, a sharp drop in trade with Russia and renewed Covid restrictions in China (Exhibit 1, right). On balance, we maintain our Q2 real GDP tracking estimate of 0.2% (non-annualised).
For the rest of the year, we anticipate weak Euro area growth given the likelihood of a large drag on consumer spending from high energy prices for consumers, weaker trade and tighter ﬁnancial conditions.
First, we expect weak consumption growth this year due to squeezed real incomes. Despite generous government support to households and accelerated nominal wage growth from 2022H2, both real wages and other real income will contract substantially in 2022 (Exhibit 2, left). While we expect some unwind of excess savings that were accumulated during the pandemic to cushion this drag over 2022-23, we look for roughly ﬂat consumption in Q4/Q4 terms this year (Exhibit 2, right).
Second, the outlook for foreign demand has weakened further as growth has slowed abroad (Exhibit 3). Following very weak April data, we recently downgraded our growth expectations for China, and now expect 4% growth this year (vs 4.5% previously). Also, we downgraded our 2022 and 2023 US growth forecasts to 1.25% and 1.5% (both on a Q4/Q4 basis), respectively, in response to the sharp tightening in US ﬁnancial conditions. While the recent depreciation of the Euro will provide some cushion, our Euro area trade model points to an additional growth drag in coming quarters through lower net exports.
Third, ﬁnancial conditions have continued to tighten in recent weeks and our FCI now stands about 80bp tighter than the mid-November low. While the Euro has weakened notably on a trade-weighted basis, our overall FCI has tightened signiﬁcantly given higher long-term rates, lower equities and wider sovereign and credit spreads (Exhibit 4, left). Our FCI growth impulse—the estimated effect of ﬁnancial conditions on growth— has therefore turned notably negative since the start of the year.
We therefore lower the Euro area growth outlook slightly further, reinforcing our below-consensus growth view for the Euro area (Exhibit 5). More speciﬁcally, we lower Q3, Q4 and Q1 by a tenth each, to 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. This pushes down our 2022 growth forecast to 2.5% (vs 2.7% consensus) and our 2023 projection to 1.7% (vs 2.3% consensus).
While we do not look for a recession in our baseline forecast given ﬁscal support and strong household balance sheets, the key risk remains a large-scale disruption of Russian gas supply. Our baseline assumes that Russian gas ﬂows continue largely uninterrupted, but we estimate that a complete gas ban would lower Euro area growth by 2.2pp this year, pushing the Euro area into recession (Exhibit 6). Our analysis suggests that a gas ban would imply particularly large hits to Germany (-3.4pp) and Italy (-2.5pp). We see further downside risks from a negative conﬁdence shock to consumer spending, effectively layering an aggregate demand shock on top of an aggregate supply shock.
More Embedded Inﬂation
At the same time, the incoming information implies yet more persistent inﬂationary pressures. First, our recent analysis points to more signiﬁcant second-round effects from the surge in energy prices. In particular, we ﬁnd that energy price shocks have historically pushed up long-term inﬂation expectations quite persistently and lifted wage growth notably for 1-2 years. Inﬂation expectations have already moved up and now stand slightly above the ECB’s target, but high headline inﬂation is likely to push long-term inﬂation expectations up further in coming months (Exhibit 7, left). While spot wage growth remains around 2%, we revise up our wage growth forecast given continued labour market improvement, the likelihood of second-round effects from high headline inﬂation and news of higher union wage demands. In particular, our model now points to wage growth of 3% by year-end (vs 2.5% before) and 3.3% by the end of 2023 (vs 2.75% before). Combined with the minimum wage increases in Germany, we now look for annual wage growth of 2.8%, 3.6% and 3% in 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively.
Second, we estimate that the weakness of the Euro will push up inﬂation over the next couple of years. Our analysis suggests that a 10% trade-weighted Euro depreciation lifts the level of consumer prices by somewhat less than 1% after two years (Exhibit 8, left). Should Euro weakness persist, it would add 0.15-0.5pp to annual headline inﬂation in each of the next two years, and about one third as much to core inﬂation. Consistent with this, a number of ECB speakers have recently ﬂagged that the weakness of the Euro will have a signiﬁcant effect on the June ECB staff projections.
Third, the re-intensiﬁcation and broadening of bottlenecks is likely to keep core inﬂation elevated for longer than we had anticipated. While supply-demand imbalances in the manufacturing sector appear to be easing, labour shortages and broader input costs pressures continue to weigh on supply. We summarise these pressures in a bottleneck index, which has led Euro area core inﬂation quite tightly by about a year since the start of the pandemic (Exhibit 8, right).
Taken together, we therefore raise our core inﬂation proﬁle notably for the next couple of years (Exhibit 9). We now expect area-wide core HICP inﬂation to remain at 2.2% at the end of 2023 (up from 1.8% before) and at 2.1% in 2024Q4. Our updated projections thus maintain the view that the Euro area has a more limited inﬂation problem compared to the US, where we expect core CPI inﬂation to run at 2.7% at the end of 2023. However, our updated projections now suggest that core inﬂation will remain above the ECB’s target through 2024.
That said, the inﬂation outlook remains unusually uncertain with risks skewed towards more inﬂation persistence. In particular, we calculate that a Russian gas ban would lift headline inﬂation by an additional percentage point to a peak of about 10%. Moreover, we estimate that stronger second-round effects—captured by the upper bound on the wage growth projections in Exhibit 7—would keep core inﬂation around 2.5% in 2024.
A Faster Pace
Our revised inﬂation path points to greater pressure on the Governing Council to accelerate monetary policy normalisation despite weak growth. To quantify this, we update our estimated ECB reaction function, which relates changes in the deposit rate to growth (vs potential) and inﬂation pressures (vs target). Although simple, this version of the Taylor rule has historically captured the Governing Council’s decisions fairly well and points to a rapid rise in the deposit rate to about 1.5% in early 2023 (Exhibit 10, left). Given the uncertainty around the ECB’s reaction function, we compare this rule to other candidate speciﬁcations, which points to a range of outcomes in both directions.
Although a helpful starting point, this exercise abstracts from a number of considerations that will be important in shaping the Governing Council’s exit path in practice.
First, it matters whether slower growth reﬂects weaker demand or supply. Economic principles suggest that the ECB should respond to the ﬁrmer inﬂation outlook by moving policy rates to a more normal setting despite softer growth if weaker activity primarily reﬂects supply. Moreover, our analysis suggests that the Governing Council should hike more quickly and move into restrictive territory if signiﬁcant second-round effects emerge, but tighten more cautiously if conﬁdence effects weaken demand, despite the high inﬂation numbers. Given our view that (1) the majority of the slowdown in growth reﬂects weaker supply and (2) some second-round effects are likely to emerge, these considerations support recent ECB calls for a more rapid pace of tightening (Exhibit 10, right).
Second, the assessment of what constitutes a neutral policy setting is a key driver of the speed of tightening. Estimates of the equilibrium rate (or r*) are highly uncertain in the Euro area, as reﬂected in recent ECB staff estimates (Exhibit 11, left). That said, these estimates cluster around -0.75%, pointing to a nominal neutral rate of around 1.25%.
Third, risk management is an important consideration for the pace of rate rises, given remaining vulnerabilities in the Euro area. In particular, the Governing Council is guiding towards a “gradual pace” of normalisation, signalling to move carefully in light of elevated uncertainty around the economic outlook. ECB ofﬁcials are particularly attentive to the risk of renewed sovereign stress, pledging to avoid fragmentation risk. While our debt sustainability analysis suggests that a gradual hiking path to 1.25% should be manageable for Italy’s ﬁscal outlook, the risk of ﬁscal stress could rise materially with a terminal rate above 2% (Exhibit 11, right). We believe that ECB ofﬁcials would activate a sovereign backstop in this case, including capital key deviations and some form of conditionality.
Quicker and Restrictive
Taken together, we therefore see greater urgency to act and accelerate our ECB tightening forecast (Exhibit 12). We maintain our forecast that the Governing Council will end APP at the end of June and raise the deposit rate for the ﬁrst time by 25bp in July. But we now expect the Governing Council to hike 25bp at back-to-back meetings until June next year. Compared to our previous forecast we now (1) accelerate the move towards neutral (from December to April 2023) and (2) add one extra hike that takes the monetary policy stance slightly into restrictive territory.
Given the high uncertainty around the economic outlook, we consider the scenarios for growth and inﬂation discussed above, and map these into deposit rate paths using our estimated reaction function above (Exhibit 12, right).
First, we ﬁnd that the Governing Council would hike more quickly and move further into contractionary territory with stronger second-round effects. With more elevated and persistent core inﬂation, we would expect the Governing Council to consider 50bp steps, taking the deposit rate to a peak of around 2.5%. Second, our analysis suggests that the emergence of sovereign stress – if unchecked through a backstop – could delay the hiking cycle. In practice, we think the ECB would likely trigger its sovereign yield backstop if the widening of sovereign yields was driven by speculation rather than fundamentals or an external shock. Third, a Russian gas ban, even when combined with a large negative conﬁdence shock would not necessarily delay lift-off, but would likely slow the hiking cycle after strong initial tightening and could require policy easing next year. Although stylised, these scenarios help capture the uncertainty around our faster tightening baseline.